it used to be a favorite concern of mine– to relate my personal experiences to the whole cosmic meaning of my life as a whole. i have used the i ching in this regard since my beginning with it, since i was 14 years old. in the past few years these questions have fallen to the wayside, since i have been preferring the immediacy of “the moment” and a sense of letting go of meaning in favor of “just because”. i’m returning to it tonight. maybe its the general anxiety of being a single mom who must make bills, dwelling in an unstable work environment. maybe just because its time.
the exact question, as i posed it to the i ching, was “why am i experiencing these things, in a cosmic sense, as it relates to my whole life?”
i have been thinking about hx 17 quite a bit these past few weeks. i dreamt about mist, whom i might always associate with this hexagram. i had previously understood it to relate to particular lessons that surround learning to be a true leader– i do not think that is untrue now, but i do think that there was not enough emphasis put on the whole experience of being led. that is likely my ego. even just before i sat down to write this musing, i was thinking, “i’m just not used to NOT being queen bee.”
a totally absurd thought, given my situation. i actually am queen bee of my life right now, more than i ever have been. and yet i am within the delicate shackles of “no authority” in my work experience. there is no reason why i shouldn’t be experiencing this position– after all, i have practically no work experience which should put me in a position of authority, and i will be the first person to admit that i do not have the general life experiences to lead administratively in the workforce. in practically every way i am pleased to accept this position of following at work, practically being the operative word of course. there is definitely something which causes me to ruffle my feathers a bit at it. i think it is just ego, and i think that i am learning to remove it from my life.
but to receive this hx in conjunction with 55? what a paradox– and it shouldn’t be, i’m almost sure of it. the fact that i cannot yet understand the relatedness is probably the whole jewel of what i am needing to experience right now.
there is an element of quiet listening that is suggested with 17. its a social quietness. not about listening to inner voices or babbling brooks or dusty philosophies. it is about listening to those immediately around you, without any other motive but to allow the experience of listening cause some sort of chemical reaction within, that eventually translates to taking right action. is it possible to be so strapped into this path, and still be able to give a listen? just when the situation seems to suggest that i need to exhibit vigilance, action, movement, proactivity. i don’t want to do those things at all of course. i’d rather do a bit of quiet listening.
ideally i think i would like to come out of this listening with a sense of love for those at work who hold me in this very precarious position. even as i write this, i know it is completely untrue that any being at work could truly hold me to my experience. i know that i am holding myself to any thing i perceive myself holding to. which hx is it that discusses the three ways to hold firm?
holding is similar to attachment. similar, but not the same. i think there is a moral principle to the former and a human principle to the latter. and just as morality can be a human issue, and human-ness can trigger questions of morality, it does not necessarily hold true that the two topics be synonomous.

